ABSTRACT
Objective To measure the positioning accuracy of multi-leaf collimators (MLC) leaves by using radiochromic films,with aim to providing data in support of IAEA's methodology validation.Methods The present study focused on 8 accelerators (Varian,Elekta and Siemens machines) at 6 hospitals in Henan province with highly skilled physicists.The 25 cm × 25 cm radiochromic films were put on 30 cm × 30 cm homogeneous solid phantoms and covered with a 2.0-cm-thick homogeneous solid phantom slabs.The CT-scanned images were transmitted to TPS for plan formulation.With 6 MV X-ray,MLC created 5 strip 3 cm × 0.6 cm picket fence field,each with 3.0 cm strip separation.The SSD was 100 cm at the maximum dose point,with a 250 MU to each strip.The irradiated radiochromic films were returned to IAEA for analysis within one week and compared with the values given by IAEA.Results The difference of film-measured and TPS-planned positions of MLC leaves for each strip picket fence should be within ± 0.5 mm as required by IAEA.For 7 of 8 accelerators selected,the differences of accurately measured MLC leaf positions were all within ±0.5 mm,which were in line with the IAEA requirements,with only other one being beyond-0.5 mm,not consistent with the IAEA requirements.The differences of film-measured actual widths between each pair and all pairs of leaves were within ±0.75 mm as required by IAEA for 7 accelerators,whereas the other one was outside ± 0.75 mm,not consistent with the IAEA requirements.The standard deviation of film-measured actual width of MCL leaf between each pair and all pairs for 7 accelerators were ≤ 0.3 mm as required by IAEA,whereas the other one was 0.5 mm,not consistent with IAEA requirements.Conclusions The MLC positioning accuracy of a few of medical accelerators in Henan is not qualified.It is of great significance to carry out regular quality examination as well as third-party verification to ensure precise delivery of radiotherapy.
ABSTRACT
In order to analyze the image noise effect on the results of Gamma knife dosimetry parameter test, we tested the dosimetry parameters of the Gamma knives according to GBZ 168-2005. Radiological protection standards of X (gamma)-ray stereotactic radiosurgery for head treatment. Dose analysis software was applied to examine the testing film before and after image denoising, and SPSS 11.0 software was used for statistical analysis. The results showed that there was a significant difference in the results of the maximum deviation between radiation field size and its nominal value (t = 7.600, P < 0.01) and the radiation field's penumbra region width of collimators also had significantly different sizes (t = 5.334, P < 0.01) before and after image denoising. This study indicated that the image noise could influence the results of testing Gamma knife dosimetry parameters, so as to cause deviations.
Subject(s)
Humans , Algorithms , Artifacts , Gamma Rays , Head , General Surgery , Radiometry , Radiosurgery , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted , Methods , Stereotaxic TechniquesABSTRACT
Objective To compare the analytical result of different kinds of film dose analysis software for the same gamma knife,analyze the reasons of difference caused,and explore the measurements and means for quality control and quality assurance during testing gamma knife and analyzing its result.Methods To test the Moon Deity gamma knife with Kodak EDR2 film and γ-Star gamma knife with GAFCHROMIC(R) EBT film,respectively.All the validation films are scanned to proper imagine format for dose analysis software by EPSON PERFECTION V750 PRO scanner.Then imagines of Moon Deity gamma knife are analyzed with Robot Knife Adjuvant 1.09 and Fas-09 1.0,and imagines of γ-Star gamma knife with Fas-09 and MATLAB 7.0.Results There is no significant difference in the maximum deviation of radiation field size ( Full Width at Half Maximum,FWHM) and its nominal value between Robot Knife Adjuvant and Fas-09 for Moon Deity gamma knife (t = -2.133,P ＞0.05).The analysis on the radiation field' s penumbra region width of collimators which have different sizes indicated that the differences are significant (t = - 8.154,P ＜ 0.05 ).There is no significant difference in the maximum deviation of FWHM and its nominal value between Fas-09 and MATLAB for γ-Star gamma knife ( t = - 1.384,P ＞0.05 ).However,following national standards,analysis of φ4 mm width of collimators can obtain different results according to the two kinds software,and the result of Fas-09 is not qualified while MATLAB is qualified.The analysis on the radiation field' s penumbra region width of collimators which have different sizes indicates that the differences are significant ( t = 3.074,P ＜ 0.05 ).The imagines are processed with Fas-09.The analysis of imagine in the pre-and the post-processing indicates that there is no significant difference in the maximum deviation of FWHM and its nominal value ( t = 0.647,P ＞ 0.05 ),and the analytical result of the radiation field' s penumbra region width indicates that there is no significant difference as well ( t = -0.627,P ＞ 0.05 ).Conclusion The study shows that different kinds of film dose analysis software may have some differences in analysis of the same gamma knife validation film,and the results may lead to the different decisions in accordance with national standard.